Abstract:
The purpose of the NATO Next Generation Rotorcraft Capability (NGRC) Support Partnership funded Novel Powerplant concept study was to identify, analyze, and compare novel powerplant concepts that could fulfill the NGRC need in a solution-agnostic approach. The outcome of the study provided NSPA and the NGRC participating nations with increased knowledge and understanding of the powerplant domain to inform assessment of future NGRC platforms. This study modeled four aircraft configurations to derive propulsion sizing requirements and compared propulsion configurations for each. The propulsion system configurations considered included three levels of conventional gas turbine technology (In-service GT, 2025 GT, and 2035 GT), hybrid electric (battery), hybrid hydrogen fuel cell, and hydrogen combustion. The results of the study considered both quantitative and qualitative evaluations. The quantitative analysis determined aircraft and propulsion system sizing to align with the expected NGRC need at different max cruise speeds, and compared performance along with recurring, non-recurring, and operational costs for each. The qualitative analysis investigated the impacts of wider technical, capability, and supportability considerations for each propulsion concept. Assuming a notional NGRC entry into service target date of 2035, this study shows that, when considering both quantitative analysis and a qualitative review, a modern gas turbine is the most reasonable solution space to deliver the performance and multi-mission capability expected.