Abstract:
This study examines the ability of a large (1200 lb gross weight) hexacopter with collective pitch controlled rotors to tolerate single motor failure. The hexacopter is considered in various orientations, and the vehicle is trimmed with one motor inoperative (OMI). Unlike RPM-controlled hexacopters, which were trimmable but uncontrollable in hover, and were untrimmable in cruise with an aft-rotor failure; with pitch-control the hexacopter is controllable in hover as well as trimmable for failure of any rotor in cruise (including an aft rotor failure). The study examines how pitch controls, and thrust are redistributed amongst the operational rotors, post-failure, for the different hexacopter orientations. For each case, the maximum thrust and torque increases on any individual rotor, and the total power increase, post-failure is examined. It is found that the hardest to trim cases are those where the hub torque and the hub drag induced yaw moment of the failed rotor add, and fault compensation for these cases usually comes at a high cost in terms of torque penalty and power requirement (necessitating use of more powerful motors and batteries). The results from the study indicated that operating the pitch-controlled hexacopter in an edge-first configuration with a clockwise spinning rotor 1 is the best choice from a fault tolerance perspective.